<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Public Media Texas: News, US-Mexico Border, Politics, Arts and Culture, Sustainability, Texas &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publicmediatexas.org/category/sustainability_environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publicmediatexas.org</link>
	<description>Public Media Texas brings the conversation on Texas public radio airwaves to your screen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gas Drilling Companies Hold Data Needed by Researchers to Assess Risk to Water Quality</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/05/18/gas-drilling-companies-hold-data-needed-by-researchers-to-assess-risk-to-water-quality/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/05/18/gas-drilling-companies-hold-data-needed-by-researchers-to-assess-risk-to-water-quality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 11:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=6278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[byAbrahm Lustgarten ProPublica For years the natural gas drilling industry has decried the lack of data that could prove or disprove that drilling can cause drinking water contamination. Only baseline data, they said, could show without a doubt that water was clean before drilling began. The absence of baseline data was one of the most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>byAbrahm Lustgarten                        								    													ProPublica</p>
<p>For years the natural gas drilling industry has decried the lack of data that could prove or disprove that drilling can cause drinking water contamination. Only baseline data, they said, could show without a doubt that water was clean before drilling began. </p>
<p>The absence of baseline data was one of the most serious criticisms leveled at a group of Duke researchers last week when they published the first peer-reviewed study linking drilling to methane contamination in water supplies. </p>
<p><span id="more-6278"></span>
<p>That study2014which found that methane concentrations in drinking water increased dramatically with proximity to gas wells2014contained 201Cno baseline information whatsoever,201D wrote Chris Tucker, a spokesman for the industry group Energy in Depth, in a statement debunking the study. </p>
<p>Now it turns out that some of that data does exist. It just wasn2019t available to the Duke researchers, or to the public. </p>
<p>Ever since high-profile water contamination cases were linked to drilling in Dimock, Pa. in late 2008, drilling companies themselves have been diligently collecting water samples from private wells before they drill, according to several industry consultants who have been working with the data. While Pennsylvania regulations now suggest pre-testing water wells within 1,000 feet of a planned gas well, companies including Chesapeake Energy, Shell and Atlas have been compiling samples from a much larger radius 2013 up to 4,000 feet from every well. The result is one of the largest collections of pre-drilling water samples in the country. </p>
<p>201CThe industry is sitting on hundreds of thousands of pre and post drilling data sets,201D said Robert Jackson, one of the Duke scientists who authored the study, published May 9 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Jackson relied on 68 samples for his study. 201CI asked them for the data and they wouldn2019t share it.201D</p>
<p>The water tests could help settle the contentious debate over the environmental risks of drilling, particularly the invasive part of the process called <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/fracking-music-video">hydraulic fracturing</a><span> [1]</span>, where millions of gallons of toxic chemicals and water are pumped underground to fracture rock. Residents from Wyoming to Pennsylvania fear that the chemicals will seep into aquifers and pollute water supplies, and in some cases they complain it already has. But the lack of scientific research on the issue 2013 including a dearth of baseline water samples 2013 has hindered efforts by government and regulators to understand the risks. </p>
<p>The industry has two reasons to collect the data: To get to the bottom of water contamination problems, and to protect itself when people complain that drilling harmed their drinking water. </p>
<p>201CUnless you have the baseline before the analysis you can argue until the sky turns green,201D said Anthony Gorody, a geochemist who often works for the energy industry. 201CThe only real way to address this without anybody bitching and moaning is by doing this before and after.201D</p>
<p>Chesapeake Energy alone has tested thousands of private water supplies in the Marcellus Shale, and the company says its findings demonstrate that much of the water was contaminated before drilling began. </p>
<p>201CWater quality testing2026 has shown numerous issues with local groundwater,201D wrote the company2019s spokesman, Jim Gipson, in an email to ProPublica. 201COne out of four water sources have detectable levels of methane present2026 and about one in four fail one or more EPA drinking water standards.201D </p>
<p>Gipson declined to elaborate on the findings or share Chesapeake2019s test results, making it difficult to verify whether the companies had, indeed, found the water was contaminated before drilling began. But he did note that Pennsylvania does not regulate water quality in private wells and that water sampling is typically not done by homeowners. </p>
<p>201CThis fact substantially explains why many of these pre-existing issues have not been previously identified or resolved by landowners,201D he wrote. </p>
<p>It is also unclear whether Pennsylvania state environment officials 2013 who declined to answer questions for this story 2013 have been allowed to review the industry data or are using it when they investigate drilling accidents in the state. </p>
<p>That leaves open questions about who will see the water data, whether it has been verified by independent labs, and how it might be useful in the public debate. The Environmental Protection Agency2019s study of hydraulic fracturing is due to be completed next year, and the Department of Energy recently appointed a review panel to assess the risks of drilling. </p>
<p>Energy in Depth2019s Tucker and others expect the industry will eventually make its data public.</p>
<p>201CThere has been talk about releasing it and putting it in the public domain,201D said Fred Baldassare, a former Pennsylvania environment official and expert on underground gas migration who now consults for the industry. Baldassare said the drilling companies were concerned that releasing water test results could affect property values for residents and amounted to a violation of their privacy. 201CHow do you identify these points while maintaining some confidentiality?201D</p>
<p>Jackson said the data should be made available now to independent researchers and to agencies investigating the hydraulic fracturing process. But even without the data, he stands behind his study. The Duke report said that the link between drilling activity and water degradation was clear, and said the contaminants could be migrating through manmade underground fractures, or, more likely, were coming from cracks in the well structure itself. The researchers said the wells they analyzed had been hydraulically fractured, but that more study of that process was needed to understand whether fracturing might be causing the contamination. No indicators of fracturing fluids were found in the samples. </p>
<p>Jackson likened the questions about drilling risk to those about the link between smoking and lung cancer. </p>
<p>201CIn an ideal study you follow people through their lives. You take measurements on them in their lungs as they start smoking and as you grow old. That2019s what you need to prove cause and effect,201D he said. 201CBut instead they asked: 2018If you smoke, did you get lung cancer?2019 That doesn2019t prove that smoking is the cause, but it2019s a pretty good step. </p>
<p>201CThat2019s all we did here. If you live near a gas well are you more likely to have methane contamination? That answer is yes. It2019s not proof, but it2019s a good first step.201D</p>
<p>Follow on Twitter: <a href="http://www.twitter.com/AbrahmL">@AbrahmL</a><span> [2]</span></p>
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.propublica.org/article/gas-drilling-companies-have-the-water-quality-methane-risk-data/single"><meta name="syndication-source" content="http://www.propublica.org/article/gas-drilling-companies-have-the-water-quality-methane-risk-data/single"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://pixel.propublica.org/pixel.js" async></script><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/05/18/gas-drilling-companies-hold-data-needed-by-researchers-to-assess-risk-to-water-quality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Wind Power Grows Along the Gulf Coast</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/02/11/texas-wind-power-grows-along-the-gulf-coast/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/02/11/texas-wind-power-grows-along-the-gulf-coast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenedy Ranch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=6169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Kate Galbraith, The Texas Tribune 5 hours ago SARITA — On the 400,000-acre Kenedy Ranch along the southern Gulf Coast, the wind coming off the water nearly flattops the clusters of oak trees. Towering above the trees, above the long grasses, sand dunes, grazing cattle and the occasional antelope, are scores of wind turbines, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><article>
<header>
<li class="byline">    by <a href="http://www.texastribune.org/about/staff/kate-galbraith/" class="author">Kate Galbraith</a>, The Texas Tribune
<li><time datetime="2011-02-11T05:00:00">                                                5 hours ago                                    </time></li>
</header>
<div class="content">
<p><span>SARITA — On the 400,000-acre </span><a href="http://www.kenedyranchmuseum.org/" target="_blank">Kenedy Ranch</a><span> along the southern Gulf Coast, the wind coming off the water nearly flattops the clusters of oak trees. Towering above the trees, above the long grasses, sand dunes, grazing cattle and the occasional antelope, are scores of wind turbines, each about as tall as a football field is long.</span></p>
<p><span>“It’s always nice to be cranking,” said Daniel Pitts, who manages the wind plant for its owner, </span><a href="http://iberdrolarenewables.us" target="_blank">Iberdrola Renewables</a><span>, as the machines spun in the breeze.</span></p>
<p><span>The wind farm, which began operating in 2009 and doubled in size last year, reflects the new geography of wind power in Texas, the country’s leading wind state. The vast majority of Texas turbines have gone up in the west, harnessing fierce winds that sweep southward from the plains. But the West Texas projects have been hindered by a </span><a href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-environmental-news/crez-transmission-lines/series-explores-texas-transmission-lines-for-wind/" target="_blank">lack of transmission lines</a><span> to carry the power. Meanwhile, several big wind farms have begun operating in the general vicinity of Corpus Christi in the past few years, and it is likely that more coastal projects are on the way.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-6169"></span></p>
<p><span>“The short term for coastal wind is great,” said Patrick Woodson, the chief development officer for E.ON Climate and Renewables North America, which last year expanded a </span><a href="http://www.eoncrna.com/contentNews_4.22.09.html" target="_blank">wind farm it owns just north of Corpus Christi</a><span>. “There will be a number of prime sites that get built out in the next two to four years.”</span></p>
<p><span>South Texas now accounts for roughly one-ninth of the state’s total wind capacity. A substantial amount of the </span><span>recent wind growth on the </span><a href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-energy/energy/texplainer-why-does-texas-have-its-own-power-grid/" target="_blank">Texas electric grid,</a><span> which gets </span><a href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-energy/electric-reliability-council-texas/why-texas-is-using-more-coal-wind-and-less-gas/" target="_blank">nearly 8 percent of its power from wind</a><span>, came from the coast, said Barry Smitherman, the chairman of the Public Utility Commission. Transmission infrastructure is plentiful along the coast, unlike in West Texas. And coastal winds are strongest in the afternoons and in the summertime, wind experts say. That correlates well to the electric grid’s needs. West Texas winds, although more powerful, tend to blow strongest in the evening and overnight, and in the springtime.</span></p>
<p><span>But the arrival of turbines along the Gulf shores has spawned a range of concerns, from their impact on birds and coastal habitat to the turbines’ effect on military radar.</span></p>
<p><span>“I think it’s a tragedy for the state and the coast,” said Jack Hunt, the former chief executive of the </span><a href="http://www.texasmonthly.com/2007-08-01/feature.php" target="_blank">storied</a><span> 825,000-acre </span><a href="http://www.king-ranch.com/" target="_blank">King Ranch</a><span>, which is next door to the Kenedy Ranch, where Iberdrola and another developer, </span><a href="http://www.patternenergy.com/" target="_blank">Pattern Energy</a><span>, have recently erected wind farms.</span></p>
<p><span>A few years ago, the King Ranch teamed with a local chapter of the Audubon Society and other environmental groups and sued — unsuccessfully — to try to stop the Kenedy Ranch wind projects. Hunt, who remains a consultant to the King Ranch, said the ranch was concerned about the potentially damaging effect on coastal wetlands and wildlife, and was irked that wind farms in Texas can be built essentially without permits.</span></p>
<p><span>This part of the Gulf Coast lies along a major migratory bird path, and wind developers say they take extra precautions to guard against bird deaths. Iberdrola and Pattern have both installed a new type of radar that is supposed to detect large flocks of approaching birds so that the turbines can be turned off at critical times. </span></p>
<p><span>Iberdrola has completed the first year of a three-year survey of bird deaths on its coastal wind farm, and the company estimates that there have been a handful of bird and bat deaths per turbine. That is in line with turbines elsewhere in the country, said Stu Webster, Iberdrola’s director of wind permitting, who added that no endangered species have been found dead (though some birds have proven impossible to identify).</span></p>
<p><span>David Newstead, president of the Corpus Christi-based </span><a href="http://www.coastalbendaudubon.org/" target="_blank">Coastal Bend Audubon Society</a><span>, said that little substantial data on bird deaths has been made public by the wind farms, and that the turbines’ effect “remains a major cause of concern around here.”</span></p>
<p><span>The </span><a href="http://auth.cnic.navy.mil/navycni/groups/public/documents/document/cnicp_a164770.pdf" target="_blank">Naval Air Station Kingsville</a><span>, a training ground for jet pilots, worries about the turbines interfering with its radar — the spinning machines look like airplanes on the screens of military radar operators. Capt. Mark McLaughlin, the station’s commanding officer, said the Navy has had to “tweak” its radar to block out the Kenedy Ranch turbines, even though they are more than 20 miles from its airfields.</span></p>
<p><span>Filings with the Federal Aviation Administration show that there have been proposals for additional wind developments between five and 25 miles of the base, McLaughlin said. “We are very concerned about how close these wind turbines are,” he said, adding that nationally the Navy would like wind farm construction to stay outside a 30-mile radius of its facilities.</span></p>
<p><span>Wind developers have encountered some unusual issues along the coast. Pitts said no hurricanes have struck since Iberdrola’s wind farm began operating, but that corrosion poses problems for the turbines because of the “salt fog” that envelops the area. Woodson said workers at E.ON’s coastal wind farm, which is built above cotton fields, have spotted alligators in drainage ditches.</span></p>
<p><span>E.ON is looking at other coastal sites, according to Woodson. Iberdrola and Pattern both have the option of putting additional turbines on the Kenedy Ranch, which is closely tied to the Catholic Church and gives its wind royalties to charities.</span></p>
<p><span>Coastal wind farms cannot proliferate indefinitely, however. Woodson said that good sites are hard to come by on the coast, especially given the environmental and airspace concerns. Moreover, once a $5 billion statewide transmission line build-out to aid wind power is completed, wind farms will most likely resume their rapid growth in western Texas, where land and good winds are plentiful. The Panhandle in particular, which has the </span><a href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-energy/wind-energy/remoteness-a-hurdle-in-harvesting-panhandles-winds/" target="_blank">strongest winds of any Texas region but is currently beyond most transmission lines</a><span>, “will be really hard to compete with,” Woodson said.</span></p>
<p><span>Texas is also hoping to develop offshore wind power in the Gulf, and the state’s General Land Office has leased out four parcels for offshore wind development since 2005. No turbines have gone up. But Herman J. Schellstede, a Louisiana-based official with </span><a href="http://coastalpointenergy.com/Coastal_Point_Energy_LLC.html" target="_blank">Coastal Point Energy</a><span>, a development company that has taken the leases, said he aims to put up a test turbine on an offshore platform nine miles south of Galveston and have it operational by October. The turbine would replace a meteorological tower that has measured the winds there for over three years.</span></p>
<p><span>“Two hurricanes have gone directly over our tower without any damage, thank God,” Schellstede said.</span></p>
</p></div>
</article>
<p>This article originally appeared in <a href="http://www.texastribune.org/">The Texas Tribune</a> at <a href="http://trib.it/igBwFr">http://trib.it/igBwFr</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/02/11/texas-wind-power-grows-along-the-gulf-coast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gulf Claims Chief Announces Payment Plan That Assumes Quick Recovery</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/02/02/gulf-claims-chief-announces-payment-plan-that-assumes-quick-recovery/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/02/02/gulf-claims-chief-announces-payment-plan-that-assumes-quick-recovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf of Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=6145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Sasha Chavkin ProPublica, Feb. 2, 2011, 3 p.m. Gulf spill paymaster Kenneth Feinberg today released a draft of his long-awaited methodology for deciding payments on final claims for damages from the BP oil spill 2013 and has endorsed an optimistic prediction of how quickly the region2019s economy will recover that is likely to spark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>by Sasha Chavkin                        								    																					ProPublica, Feb. 2, 2011, 3 p.m.</p>
<p>Gulf spill paymaster Kenneth Feinberg today released a draft of his long-awaited methodology for deciding payments on final claims for damages from the BP oil spill 2013 and has endorsed an optimistic prediction of how quickly the region2019s economy will recover that is likely to spark controversy among claimants. <span id="more-6145"></span></p>
<p>You can read Feinberg2019s proposed methodology <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/gulf-claims-announcement-feb.-2-20111">here</a><span> [1]</span>, as well as a <a href="http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/gulf-claims-announcement-2-2-2011-supplemental">report estimating the recovery period</a><span> [2]</span> for the Gulf of Mexico. Feinberg commissioned the report to help him figure out his compensation program.</p>
<p>As we2019ve noted, <a href="http://www.propublica.org/article/gulf-claims-czar-makes-mixed-progress-on-transparency-pledges">Feinberg initially said</a><span> [3]</span> he would release the methodology last December, and he explained the delays in its publication by emphasizing that 201C<a href="http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2011/01/feinberg_final_interim_oil_spi.html">I2019ve got to get this right</a><span> [4]</span>.201D</p>
<p>Feinberg2019s plan assumes that with the exception of oyster harvesters, the Gulf of Mexico will experience a full recovery by the end of 2012. Based on these predictions, he will pay claimants twice their estimated losses from 2010 for final claims, deducting any claims payments they have already received. Oyster harvesters, who he projects will face a slower recovery, will receive four times their losses from 2010.</p>
<p>The documents released today are draft proposals and not final rules, and a two-week comment period begins today in which the public can weigh in on Feinberg2019s plans.</p>
<p><script src="http://pixel.propublica.org/pixel.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/02/02/gulf-claims-chief-announces-payment-plan-that-assumes-quick-recovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Speech And The Issues</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/26/obamas-speech-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/26/obamas-speech-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heatlth Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=6130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you missed President Obama&#8217;s State of the Union address, NPR.org reporters analyzed what the president said (and didn&#8217;t) about the issues they cover. Here are some of the highlights from their coverage. You can read the full article here. Jobs: Facing slow job growth rate and a 9.4 percent unemployment, Obama focused on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>In case you missed President Obama&#8217;s State of the Union address, <a href="http://www.npr.org">NPR.org</a> reporters analyzed what the president said (and didn&#8217;t) about the issues they cover. Here are some of the highlights from their coverage. You can read the full article <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2011/01/25/133225802/on-the-issues-analyzing-obamas-speech">here</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li> <em>Jobs</em>: Facing slow job growth rate and a 9.4 percent unemployment, Obama focused on the need for job creation through clean energy, a cut in the corporate tax rate and the need to cut government spending.</li>
<li> <em>Health Care</em>: While Obama said that he was willing to work on legislation that would improve the new health care bill, he also said &#8220;What I&#8217;m not willing to do is go back to the days when insurance  companies could deny someone coverage because of a pre-existing  condition.&#8221;</li>
<li> <em>Earmarks</em>: &#8220;And because the American people deserve to know that special interests  aren&#8217;t larding up legislation with pet projects, both parties in  Congress should know this: If a bill comes to my desk with earmarks  inside, I will veto it,&#8221; President Obama said.</li>
<li> <em>Iraq and Afghanistan</em>: While most of Obama&#8217;s speech focused on domestic issues, Obama was brief about Iraq and Afghanistan and reiterated the goal of American troop withdrawal.</li>
<li> <em>Clean Energy</em>: Obama set a new goal for America, stating that he hopes to have 80 percent of America&#8217;s electricity from clean energy by 2035</li>
<li> <em>Transportation</em>: Obama also stated a new goal for high speed railways,  saying that he wants 80 percent of the population to have access to high speed rail within 25 years</li>
<li> <em>Education</em>: While calling for more science and math education to compete with China and India, Obama also challenged states for ideas on how to improve education. &#8220;That&#8217;s why instead of just pouring money into a system that&#8217;s not  working, we launched a competition called Race to the Top,&#8221; the  president said. &#8220;To all 50 states, we said, &#8216;If you show us the most  innovative plans to improve teacher quality and student achievement,  we&#8217;ll show you the money.&#8217;&#8221;</li>
<li> <em>Immigration</em>: Obama challenged congress to &#8220;take on, once and for all, the issue of illegal immigration&#8221;</li>
<li> <em>Competitiveness</em>: &#8220;This is our generation&#8217;s Sputnik moment,&#8221; said Obama while still stressing the need for innovation in industry and job creation.</li>
<li> <em>Electric Cars</em>: Another goal: a million electric cars on the road by 2015</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/26/obamas-speech-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aided by Oil, Carbon Capture Projects Advance in Texas</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/07/aided-by-oil-carbon-capture-projects-advance-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/07/aided-by-oil-carbon-capture-projects-advance-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 05:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=6087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Kate Galbraith, The Texas Tribune January 7, 2011 The Obama administration views carbon dioxide as a pollutant that warms the earth, and it imposed new regulations at the beginning of the year to begin to control CO2 emissions. But to Texas oilmen, carbon dioxide is a useful — and scarce — commodity that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>by <a href="http://www.texastribune.org/about/staff/kate-galbraith/" class="author">Kate Galbraith</a>, The Texas Tribune        <br /><span class="date">January 7, 2011</span></p>
<p>The Obama administration views carbon dioxide as a pollutant that warms the earth, and it imposed new regulations at the beginning of the year to begin to control CO2 emissions. But to Texas oilmen, carbon dioxide is a useful — and scarce — commodity that is vital to extracting hard-to-reach oil reserves.</p>
<p><span>In Texas, the nation’s largest oil producer, the demand for CO2 is soaring — because carbon dioxide can help squeeze oil out of formations deep in the earth — and new carbon dioxide-producing facilities are in the works. </span></p>
<p><span id="more-6087"></span>
<p><span>Last month, Texas air-quality regulators approved crucial permits for two coal-fired power plants that will capture their carbon dioxide emissions and sell them for use in nearby oil fields. A major new pipeline operated by Plano-based Denbury Resources began ferrying carbon dioxide from Mississippi to oilfields near Houston last month.</span></p>
<p><span>“The demand for carbon dioxide is very, very large,&#8221; said Steve Melzer, the Midland-based president of the </span><a href="http://txccsa.org/" target="_blank">Texas Carbon Capture and Storage Association</a><span>. He added that some oil-extraction projects are on hold because they cannot buy enough carbon dioxide.</span></p>
<p><span>The idea of capturing carbon dioxide and pumping it underground is gaining traction in the power sector. It sounds like an exercise in environmental idealism: Take the heat-trapping gas — belched prolifically from coal plants, which generate 45 percent of the nation’s electricity — and bury it, benefiting the atmosphere and combating global climate change. Of course, it is something of an environmental conundrum that stowing the greenhouse gas underground can also help to produce more fossil fuels.</span></p>
<p><span>Carbon dioxide is a “fantastic solvent,” said Susan Hovorka, a scientist with the </span><a href="http://www.beg.utexas.edu/gccc/" target="_blank">Gulf Coast Carbon Center</a><span> at the University of Texas’ Jackson School of Geosciences. In a nearly liquid form, it can mix with the underground oil, making the oil more fluid and easier to extract. Water gets pumped in before the carbon dioxide; when carbon dioxide is unavailable, water suffices, but it is not as effective.</span></p>
<p><span>Some of the carbon dioxide comes back out with the oil, but that gets separated and reused in the wells. When the project has finished producing oil, the vast majority of the carbon dioxide stays underground and will not leak out of the tiny pores it is wedged into, said Hovorka, whose team has monitored two oil fields in the state and verified that the gas does not escape.</span></p>
<p><span>Capturing carbon dioxide can increase a coal plant’s capital cost by 30 percent — a key reason why no major power plant with that capability has been built in the United States. One pilot-scale project, slated to expand, has been </span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/22/science/earth/22coal.html" target="_blank">operating in West Virginia since 2009</a><span>, and another plant that may capture and store carbon dioxide is under construction in Indiana. In addition to the two proposed Texas plants, projects are in the planning phases in California, Illinois, Kentucky and Mississippi, said Julio Friedmann, director of the carbon management program at </span><a href="https://www.llnl.gov/" target="_blank">Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory</a><span>.</span></p>
<p><span>Texas, however, has a major advantage over most other states: it can put the carbon dioxide to use. The West Virginia plant pumps carbon dioxide underground just to keep it out of the air, but Texas plants can sell it to oil companies. </span></p>
<p><span>Texas has been using carbon dioxide to help extract oil since the early 1970s. Much of the state’s supply gets piped in from New Mexico and Colorado, where dome formations yield CO2 in abundant quantities. In recent years — due to high, albeit fluctuating, oil prices that motivate oil producers to expand operations — demand for carbon dioxide has far outstripped supply in the Permian Basin. Prices there for carbon dioxide for new projects have more than doubled in the past five years and are now close to half the wellhead price of natural gas, measured by volume, according to Melzer.</span></p>
<p><span>It seems odd that Texas, which because of its heavy industry discharges more carbon dioxide into the air than any other state, would need to import it. But this could begin to change, in a modest way, with the construction of the two coal plants that received air permits last month. One is a $3.5 billion to $4 billion plant called the </span><a href="http://www.tenaskatrailblazer.com/" target="_blank">Tenaska Trailblazer Energy Center</a><span> near Sweetwater; the other is a </span><a href="http://www.summitpower.com/projects/coal-gasification-carbon-capture/the-texas-clean-energy-project-tcep-odessa-texas/" target="_blank">$2.2 billion plant near Odessa</a><span> built by Summit Power. </span></p>
<p><span>Neither power plant is being built yet, but they plan to capture 85 percent or more of their carbon dioxide emissions and sell them to oil companies. </span><a href="http://www.texastribune.org/texas-politics/laura-miller/an-interview-with-former-dallas-mayor-laura-miller/" target="_blank">Laura Miller</a><span>, Summit’s director of projects in Texas, said the Odessa plant will get one-third of its revenue from selling power, one-third from selling fertilizer — a byproduct of a coal-gasification process to be used by the plant — and one-third from selling carbon dioxide.</span></p>
<p><span>Some environmentalists — in effect acknowledging that the country cannot quickly wean itself off coal, the dirtiest fossil fuel — have tepidly endorsed the concept of capturing carbon dioxide from coal plants and storing it underground. Jim Marston, the Texas head of the </span><a href="http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=646&#038;test" target="_blank">Environmental Defense Fund</a><span>, which received a </span><a href="http://www.edf.org/pressrelease.cfm?ContentID=11010" target="_blank">written commitment from Tenaska to using carbon-capture technologies</a><span>, noted that the state’s planned plants would help show that the technology works.</span></p>
<p><span>Whether Texas’ plants actually get built remains to be seen. Around the country, some similar projects have folded or stalled due to cost. The failure last year of federal legislation that would in effect have put a price on greenhouse gas emissions hurt the economics of the plants, which will sell power at market prices in Texas. </span></p>
<p><span>But federal and state help have pushed the Texas projects along. Both Texas and the federal Environmental Protection Agency have recently issued new rules governing carbon capture projects designed to provide clarity for the industry — and have also provided financial help. In Summit’s case, the plant received $450 million in federal incentives, and it is eligible for state incentives, including a </span><a href="http://www.bdlaw.com/assets/attachments/Carbon%20Storage%20-%20Texas%20Stakes%20its%20Claim%20NRE%20Fall%2010%20LGromatzky_PGregg.pdf" target="_blank">tax credit, approved in the last legislative session, worth up to $100 million</a><span>.</span></p>
<p><span>A few Texans are already looking far ahead, to when carbon dioxide, because of its heat-trapping properties, gets buried for its own sake — not just in oil fields. The Gulf Coast Carbon Center recently received $10 million in funding from the federal stimulus package and Texas’ General Land Office to study the possibility of storing carbon dioxide emissions under the Gulf of Mexico — “not that anyone is going to want to do it tomorrow,” Hovorka said.</span></p>
<p>This article originally appeared in <a href="http://www.texastribune.org/">The Texas Tribune</a> at <a href="http://trib.it/fzRYTB">http://trib.it/fzRYTB</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/07/aided-by-oil-carbon-capture-projects-advance-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Denies Greenhouse Gas Stay for Texas</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/02/federal-court-denies-greenhouse-gas-stay-for-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/02/federal-court-denies-greenhouse-gas-stay-for-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 16:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Luke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=6072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Kate Galbraith, The Texas Tribune December 29, 2010 Texas&#8217; bid to stop the federal government&#8217;s efforts to regulate greenhouse gases hit another roadblock today, when the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals turned down the state&#8217;s request for a stay of a move to force states to implement federal plans.  &#8220;Petitioners have not met their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>by <a href="http://www.texastribune.org/about/staff/kate-galbraith/" class="author">Kate Galbraith</a>, The Texas Tribune        <br /><span class="date">December 29, 2010</span></p>
<p><span>Texas&#8217; bid to stop the federal government&#8217;s efforts to regulate greenhouse gases hit another roadblock today, when the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals turned down the state&#8217;s request for a stay of a move to force states to implement federal plans. </span></p>
<p><span>&#8220;</span><span>Petitioners have not met their burden to satisfy the legal </span><span>standards required to allow a stay pending appeal,&#8221; </span><a href="http://static.texastribune.org/media/documents/Order_Denying_Stay_-_Dec_29_-_2010.pdf" target="_blank">the court said</a><span>, in its short denial.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-6072"></span>
<p>Texas has been at the forefront of efforts — including in the courts — to stop the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases. <span>Last week the EPA </span><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/23/us/23emit.html" target="_blank">announced</a><span> that it would directly take over the emissions permitting process for new Texas refineries and power plants. Texas is the only state in the country refusing to implement the EPA&#8217;s greenhouse gas regulations, which begin (in a limited way) in January.</span></p>
<p><span>Environmentalists praised the court&#8217;s move. The Environmental Defense Fund &#8220;urges Governor Perry and Attorney General Abbott to stop wasting tax payer dollars on frivolous lawsuits, which only seek to protect big polluters,&#8221; said Jim Marston, director of the group&#8217;s Texas office, in a statement.</span></p>
<p>According to the EDF, earlier Texas efforts to stop the EPA have also been rebuffed by the D.C. Circuit.</p>
<p><span>Texas&#8217;s efforts are hardly over, however. &#8220;The Respondent&#8217;s Motion for dismissal or in the alternative transfer to the D.C. Circuit remains before the panel,&#8221; the 5th Circuit said. </span></p>
<p>This article originally appeared in <a href="http://www.texastribune.org/">The Texas Tribune</a> at <a href="http://trib.it/gsoMlH">http://trib.it/gsoMlH</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2011/01/02/federal-court-denies-greenhouse-gas-stay-for-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Houston Suburbs Continue to Sink</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/22/houston-suburbs-continue-to-sink/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/22/houston-suburbs-continue-to-sink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=5897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KUHF News [MP3] Parts of northwestern Harris County are sinking at an unusual rate. Now a study from geologists at the University of Houston reveals that some points in Jersey Village are subsiding by more than two inches a year. Three geologists from the University of Houston analyzed GPS data from 1995 to 2005. Dr. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://app1.kuhf.org/houston_public_radio-news-display.php?articles_id=1287520399">KUHF News</a> <a href="http://app1.kuhf.org/audiolibrary/101019susidence.mp3">[MP3]</a></p>
<p>Parts of northwestern Harris County are sinking at an unusual rate. Now a study from geologists at the University of Houston reveals that some points in Jersey Village are subsiding by more than two inches a year.<br />
<span id="more-5897"></span><br />
Three geologists from the University of Houston analyzed GPS data from 1995 to 2005. Dr. Shuhab Khan says it has long been known that the area is sinking, but the new study reveals the exact locations and also the rate of the subsidence. </p>
<p>“What we have done, we have used the latest GPS technology. We found out certain areas are not moving anymore or as fast. But this area, northwest of Houston, stands out because it’s subsiding rapidly.” </p>
<p>Khan says that as more and more people move to Northwest Harris County, the demand for groundwater rises as well. But developers have been pumping out the water faster than rain can replenish it. That leads to the subsidence. </p>
<p>Khan says two things might be making it worse: underground fault lines, and also underground salt domes. The domes cause the ground to slide more easily. While subsidence is happening in many urban areas around the world, the extraordinary sinking rate here is what’s worrying Khan. </p>
<p>He points at a map of Jersey Village showing blue circular areas where the ground is sinking. Those areas could see more flooding. </p>
<p>“Look at the shape of this. In the center it’s more subsiding; in the side, it’s less. So, we have a lot of rain, we have hurricanes, we have all those things. What happens with that water? That will not drain out.” </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/22/houston-suburbs-continue-to-sink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://app1.kuhf.org/audiolibrary/101019susidence.mp3" length="2501583" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Chihuahuan Desert: Our North American Outback</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/14/the-chihuahuan-desert-our-north-american-outback/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/14/the-chihuahuan-desert-our-north-american-outback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US-Mexico Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=5836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NMSU&#8216;s Kevin Von Finger guides you through the fascinating arid environment of the Chihuahuan Desert, our North American Outback. Visit ancient caves with revealing clues that indicate this desert is surprisingly young. See gigantic skeletons from animals that roamed the area in the last Ice Age-mammoths, giant sloths, and prehistoric camels. Learn about the phenomenal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><object width="500" height="400"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZQvg5TDV_nc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZQvg5TDV_nc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="400"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/NewMexicoStateU">NMSU</a>&#8216;s Kevin Von Finger guides you through the fascinating arid environment of the Chihuahuan Desert, our North American Outback. Visit ancient caves with revealing clues that indicate this desert is surprisingly young. See gigantic skeletons from animals that roamed the area in the last Ice Age-mammoths, giant sloths, and prehistoric camels. Learn about the phenomenal changes that this land has seen since the beginning of earth. Our North American Outback provides a unique journey to North America&#8217;s largest desert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/14/the-chihuahuan-desert-our-north-american-outback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Water in the Chihuahuan Desert</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/12/water-in-the-chihuahuan-desert/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/12/water-in-the-chihuahuan-desert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuatro Ciénegas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=5830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UT Austin: Visit a small town in Coahuila, Mexico called Cuatro Ciénegas where spring pools and years of isolation have resulted in uniquely endemic species evolving in isolation, similar to the Galapagos Islands. These marshlands in the desert basin contain over 70 creatures found no where else in the world, promising vast research potential. Find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><object width="500" height="306"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LpgRPDaUDRc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LpgRPDaUDRc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="306"></embed></object><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/utaustintexas">UT Austin</a>: Visit a small town in Coahuila, Mexico called Cuatro Ciénegas where spring pools and years of isolation have resulted in uniquely endemic species evolving in isolation, similar to the Galapagos Islands. These marshlands in the desert basin contain over 70 creatures found no where else in the world, promising vast research potential. Find out how the town has changed over the years and how researchers, townspeople, landowners and the government have begun working together to enact sustainable water policies and protection for the many endangered plants and animals of Cuatro Ciénegas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/12/water-in-the-chihuahuan-desert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Endangered Aquatic Box Turtle</title>
		<link>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/10/the-endangered-aquatic-box-turtle/</link>
		<comments>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/10/the-endangered-aquatic-box-turtle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publicmediatexas.org/?p=5826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: utexasCNS &#124; The Coahuilan aquatic box turtle is found in a unique valley in Mexico called Cuatrocienegas and no where else on the planet. It&#8217;s the only aquatic box turtle in the world, and is heavily protected. Scientists estimate that only about 2000 exist in the wild and their habitat is quickly shrinking due [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><object style="height: 390px; width: 500px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/E3g3fQYMG4E?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/E3g3fQYMG4E?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="500" height="390"></object><br />
From: utexasCNS | The Coahuilan aquatic box turtle is found in a unique valley in Mexico called Cuatrocienegas and no where else on the planet. It&#8217;s the only aquatic box turtle in the world, and is heavily protected. Scientists estimate that only about 2000 exist in the wild and their habitat is quickly shrinking due to over use of water in agriculture, climate change and invasive species. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://publicmediatexas.org/2010/10/10/the-endangered-aquatic-box-turtle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

